I have spent the last year looking at these arguments about stuff we
just can't seem to prove. They consist of: AGW Anthroprogenic Global
Warming, AIDS, ASD Autism Spectrum Disorder, and finally vaccinations.
There are two types of crowds we see arguing both sides of these issues and some of them actually criss-cross each other in a sort of orgy of hypocrisy reminiscent of witch hunts and inquisitions. I want to take a moment to help the reader understand that there are only two things that are commonalities involved with all of the black and white battles that continue to divide and distract us all from the root cause.
AGW:
Climategate happened and OMG here we have many organizations looking like enemies of science deliberately faking data to trick us into paying a global dictatorship to enslave us all. Yet this doesn't really disprove AGW. It merely nullifies those organization's datasets. We now have to pretend there are other datasets that are flawless. Thus the eternal inane bickering and ad-hom attacks fly in our ears and eyes until something acrid comes spewing out of our mouths.
Autism:
New whistles have been blown that show Dr. Wakefield faked his thimerasol study data. OMG now we can attack that and pretend that this is absolute proof that vaccines are not to blame for ASD. The same still applies. All we have is another worthless dataset. Get over it.
AIDS:
It doesn't exist...but wait it does exist. I know, we can label someone who has anything to say about it in the regards of not taking harmful meds a denier. Yes thats it. Brilliant. This way people will just take the easy way out and never look into themselves. Beware of people who use this language of "denier" labeling. It reeks of the stench of retard. It's an emotionally based ad-hom attack designed to make you fall in line with cynicism. Retro viruses do exist HIV does exist. The so-called deniers aren't denying that. They are simply taking a different route towards treatment and screening of the problem. There is much disinformation on the topic and very little proof to go with it for either side. Common sense is defeated as usual in this one as well.
And the grandaddy of em all Vaccinations:
One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have underlined their damage to human health).
There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any part of the world.
Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won't address those.
Yet we have so-called experts in skepticism and science and conspiracy out there evangelizing the use or dis-use of vaccinations. Believers, so to speak, that hold to their breast Unisen patches or paper proclamations that do nothing to prove anything or move us forward.
I can pretend that when Alex Jones tries to convince me of his altruism that he really means it so it must be OK to drink the Kool-Aid. I can also do the same with Dr. Novella and his cadre of contributors at the science-based-medicine blog or the SGU podcasts. Either way my logic is flawed. As much as these people think their science isn't flawed or their constitution is the end of the road or that we have undeniable freedoms for which can only be exercised by those who can afford to, everyone seems to ignore what is causing this shit storm of nonsense.
MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY and the people who covet it.
If there is a need to profit any scientist can be swayed, any evangelist can be driven, any lie can be perpetrated. Regardless of the amount of studies that say one thing or another they all were tainted with the nasty stench of money. Someone profited. Cancer isn't going to be cured because of MONEY. The war on drugs will never be won because of MONEY. The continued strife and division of the idiots who think they must pick a side and shout out their fan-boyisms are the mind-controlled slaves of someone else's profit.
The root cause of probably 80% of the worlds technical and social problems can be obliterated as soon as we grow up and collectively stop believing in money.
Until this happens technological efficiency and progress will continue to be stagnant as well as validity of research and scientific studies conducted can never hold an ounce of water here is a perfect example http://14studies.org/.
Stop spending your energy debating the undebatable and start looking at ways to remove the one thing that is stifling our species or we will never learn to cooperate and change value systems for the better. How can the layman or the expert or the generalist ever have trust in science that is conducted until this happens.
There are two types of crowds we see arguing both sides of these issues and some of them actually criss-cross each other in a sort of orgy of hypocrisy reminiscent of witch hunts and inquisitions. I want to take a moment to help the reader understand that there are only two things that are commonalities involved with all of the black and white battles that continue to divide and distract us all from the root cause.
AGW:
Climategate happened and OMG here we have many organizations looking like enemies of science deliberately faking data to trick us into paying a global dictatorship to enslave us all. Yet this doesn't really disprove AGW. It merely nullifies those organization's datasets. We now have to pretend there are other datasets that are flawless. Thus the eternal inane bickering and ad-hom attacks fly in our ears and eyes until something acrid comes spewing out of our mouths.
Autism:
New whistles have been blown that show Dr. Wakefield faked his thimerasol study data. OMG now we can attack that and pretend that this is absolute proof that vaccines are not to blame for ASD. The same still applies. All we have is another worthless dataset. Get over it.
AIDS:
It doesn't exist...but wait it does exist. I know, we can label someone who has anything to say about it in the regards of not taking harmful meds a denier. Yes thats it. Brilliant. This way people will just take the easy way out and never look into themselves. Beware of people who use this language of "denier" labeling. It reeks of the stench of retard. It's an emotionally based ad-hom attack designed to make you fall in line with cynicism. Retro viruses do exist HIV does exist. The so-called deniers aren't denying that. They are simply taking a different route towards treatment and screening of the problem. There is much disinformation on the topic and very little proof to go with it for either side. Common sense is defeated as usual in this one as well.
And the grandaddy of em all Vaccinations:
One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have underlined their damage to human health).
There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any part of the world.
Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won't address those.
Yet we have so-called experts in skepticism and science and conspiracy out there evangelizing the use or dis-use of vaccinations. Believers, so to speak, that hold to their breast Unisen patches or paper proclamations that do nothing to prove anything or move us forward.
I can pretend that when Alex Jones tries to convince me of his altruism that he really means it so it must be OK to drink the Kool-Aid. I can also do the same with Dr. Novella and his cadre of contributors at the science-based-medicine blog or the SGU podcasts. Either way my logic is flawed. As much as these people think their science isn't flawed or their constitution is the end of the road or that we have undeniable freedoms for which can only be exercised by those who can afford to, everyone seems to ignore what is causing this shit storm of nonsense.
MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY and the people who covet it.
If there is a need to profit any scientist can be swayed, any evangelist can be driven, any lie can be perpetrated. Regardless of the amount of studies that say one thing or another they all were tainted with the nasty stench of money. Someone profited. Cancer isn't going to be cured because of MONEY. The war on drugs will never be won because of MONEY. The continued strife and division of the idiots who think they must pick a side and shout out their fan-boyisms are the mind-controlled slaves of someone else's profit.
The root cause of probably 80% of the worlds technical and social problems can be obliterated as soon as we grow up and collectively stop believing in money.
Until this happens technological efficiency and progress will continue to be stagnant as well as validity of research and scientific studies conducted can never hold an ounce of water here is a perfect example http://14studies.org/.
Stop spending your energy debating the undebatable and start looking at ways to remove the one thing that is stifling our species or we will never learn to cooperate and change value systems for the better. How can the layman or the expert or the generalist ever have trust in science that is conducted until this happens.
